2026 인공지능 안전 서울 포럼

Satisfaction Survey
만족도 조사

1. 귀하의 국적을 선택해 주십시오. (Please select your nationality.)

① 내국인 (Korean) ② 외국인 (International)

2. 귀하의 연령대는 어떻게 되십니까? (Which age group do you belong to?)

① 20세 미만 (Under 20) ② 20–29세 (20–29) ③ 30–39세 (30–39) ④ 40–49세 (40–49) ⑤ 50세 이상 (50 or above)

3. 귀하의 소속 분야는 어떻게 되십니까? (Which sector do you belong to?)

① 공공 부문(정부 및 지방 당국) (Public Sector) ② 산업 부문(일반 기업) (Industry) ③ 학계 부문(연구소 및 전문가) (Academia) ④ 학생 (Student) ⑤ 기타 (Other)

4. 이번 포럼에 참석하게 된 주된 이유는 무엇입니까? (복수 선택 가능) (What was your primary reason for attending this forum? (Multiple answers allowed))

① 최신 AI 안전·보안 동향 파악 (To learn about the latest trends) ② 전문가 네트워킹 및 인사이트 교류 (To network with experts) ③ 특정 세션 또는 연사 발표 청취 (To attend a specific session) ④ 소속 기관 또는 업무와의 관련성 (Relevance to my organization's work) ⑤ 기타(직접 기재) (Other)

5. 행사 주제의 흥미도와 유익성에 대해 얼마나 만족하셨습니까? (How satisfied were you with the interest and usefulness of the forum's theme?)

① 매우 만족 (Very satisfied) ② 만족 (Satisfied) ③ 보통 (Neutral) ④ 불만족 (Dissatisfied) ⑤ 매우 불만족 (Very dissatisfied)

6. 프로그램 구성에 대해 얼마나 만족하셨습니까? (How satisfied were you with the overall program organization?)

① 매우 만족 (Very satisfied) ② 만족 (Satisfied) ③ 보통 (Neutral) ④ 불만족 (Dissatisfied) ⑤ 매우 불만족 (Very dissatisfied)

7. 연사의 전문성과 발표 내용에 대해 얼마나 만족하셨습니까? (How satisfied were you with the expertise of the speakers and the quality of their presentations?)

① 매우 만족 (Very satisfied) ② 만족 (Satisfied) ③ 보통 (Neutral) ④ 불만족 (Dissatisfied) ⑤ 매우 불만족 (Very dissatisfied)

8. 행사장의 접근성과 전반적인 환경에 대해 얼마나 만족하셨습니까? (How satisfied were you with the venue's accessibility and overall environment?)

① 매우 만족 (Very satisfied) ② 만족 (Satisfied) ③ 보통 (Neutral) ④ 불만족 (Dissatisfied) ⑤ 매우 불만족 (Very dissatisfied)

9. 통역 서비스 및 발표자료 제공에 대해 얼마나 만족하셨습니까? (How satisfied were you with the interpretation services and the presentation materials provided?)

① 매우 만족 (Very satisfied) ② 만족 (Satisfied) ③ 보통 (Neutral) ④ 불만족 (Dissatisfied) ⑤ 매우 불만족 (Very dissatisfied)

10. 행사에 대해 전반적으로 얼마나 만족하셨습니까? (Overall, how satisfied were you with the forum?)

① 매우 만족 (Very satisfied) ② 만족 (Satisfied) ③ 보통 (Neutral) ④ 불만족 (Dissatisfied) ⑤ 매우 불만족 (Very dissatisfied)

11. 향후 동료 또는 관계자에게 본 포럼을 추천할 의향이 있으십니까? (How likely are you to recommend this forum to your colleagues or professional network?)

① 매우 그렇다 (Very likely) ② 그렇다 (Likely) ③ 보통이다 (Neutral) ④ 그렇지 않다 (Unlikely) ⑤ 전혀 그렇지 않다 (Very unlikely)

12. 가장 만족스러웠던 세션은 무엇입니까? (Which session did you find the most valuable?)

① [Day 1 1-1] The Role of Standards in Safety and Security in AI ② [Day 1 1-2] Introduction of MLCommons Multi-regional Safety Benchmark ③ [Day 1 2-1] Who Defines "Good" AI? Rethinking Evaluation Beyond Static Benchmarks ④ [Day 1 3-1] Frontier AI Safety and Security: Agent, Multimodal, and Physical AI ⑤ [Day 1 3-2] Evaluating Data-Leakage Risks in Tool-Using LLM Agents: A Singapore–Korea AISI Bilateral Testing ⑥ [Day 1 3-3] Grounding AI Evaluation Locally with Multicultural and Multilingual Benchmarks ⑦ [Day 1 3-4] Building Safe AI for a Global Userbase ⑧ [Day 2 1-1] The AI Safety Index: From Accountability to a Safer Frontier ⑨ [Day 2 1-2] Challenges and Approaches in Regional-Language AI Safety Evaluation: A Korean Case Study ⑩ [Day 2 1-3] NAVER's Service-Centric AI Safety Framework ⑪ [Day 2 2-1] Judgement Day: Insights from Multimodal Red-Teaming Challenge ⑫ [Day 2 2-2] Shift Happens: Robustness and Reliability of Multimodal Foundation Models ⑬ [Day 2 2-3] Adaptive Red Teaming for Generative AI Safety and Security ⑭ [Day 2 2-4] Ready to Evaluate: Building Korea's Frontier AI Evaluation Framework ⑮ [Day 2 2-5] Automated Discovery of State-of-the-Art Adversarial Attack Methods for LLMs ⑯ [Day 2 2-6] Red-Teaming at the Frontier: Finding Universal Jailbreaks in State-of-the-Art Models

13. 추후 추가로 다루었으면 하는 주제나 향후 개선·보완이 필요한 사항이 있다면 자유롭게 작성해 주십시오. (If there are any topics you would like to see covered in future forums, or if you have suggestions for improvement, please share your feedback below.)